Dispute regarding the terms of an oral agreement whereby the applicant allegedly agreed to assign the respondent the sole rights to the intellectual property to an invention, a proportion of shares and a proportion of profits made.
In these pleadings, the applicant, by interlocutory application, sought to file and serve an amended originating application and an amended statement of claim. The first and second respondents sought to strike out the originating application and statement of claim. The applications were refused.
Matthew Doyle appeared for the Respondents, instructed by B & G Law.
The judgment is published here.