The appellant entered into a contract with the respondent for the construction of a hotel.
The appeal concerned whether a pleaded cause of action in restitution should be struck out. The basis for the claim was that the appellant had allegedly paid the respondent more than they were entitled to under the contract.
Shane Doyle QC (with T Matthews QC and D D Keane) appeared for the appellant, instructed by N R Barbi Solicitor.
The judgment is available here.
