9-12-22 / John Ware — Planning & Environment
The applicant sought declaratory relief about a delegate's decision to give a development approval. In dispute was whether the development application approved was impact assessable rather than code assessable. The applicant, Riverside, owned Riparian Plaza which is on land adjoining the Eagle Street Pier redevelopment site in Brisbane's CBD. Riverside…
9-12-22 / John Ware — Planning & Environment
The Department of Transport and Main Roads resumed land for highway upgrades running the length of the northern boundary of land owned by Aurizon. The parties valuers disagreed as to the primary methodology for valuing the land, the applicant asserted that the hypothetical development method was the primary methodology whereas…
15-11-22 / John Ware — Planning & Environment
An application pursuant to s 32 of the Planning and Environment Court Act 2016 (Qld) sought an order permitting the applicant to extend the time to file a notice of appeal. The first and second respondents opposed the application. The first respondent issued show cause and enforcement notices to the…
16-9-22 / Roger Traves KC — Planning & Environment
Roger Traves KC (leading N Loos) appeared for the appellant, instructed by Miller Bou-Samra Lawyers. The judgment is published here.
9-9-22 / Nicholas Andreatidis KC — Planning & Environment
The appellant appealed the refusal by the respondent council of its application to develop land for a high-rise retirement village over a lake on the Gold Coast on land designated as an extreme flood hazard. The council’s grounds for refusal centred on the risks to human life and safety presented…
Level 27, 239 George Street, Brisbane Qld 4000