Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 3) [2021] FCA 1254
18-8-21 / Rachel De Luchi — Judicial Review & Administrative, Professional Discipline & Regulatory
Application for costs against the Applicant following dismissal of an application for judicial review in Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 2) [2021] FCA 916. The active party Respondents sought an order for costs against the Applicant following the dismissal of the application for review. The application for costs was…
Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 2) [2021] FCA 916
6-8-21 / Rachel De Luchi — Judicial Review & Administrative, Professional Discipline & Regulatory
Led by Mr Julian Burnside QC, Rachel De Luchi appeared for the applicant in her challenges to each stage of the Professional Services Review process under the Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) (the ‘HIA’). After Dr Karmakar’s practice was reviewed, she applied to the court for declarations that decisions of…
Lee Anthony Crocker v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2020] QSC 24
4-3-20 / Matthew Hickey OAM KC, Rachel De Luchi — Building & Construction, Judicial Review & Administrative
Matthew Hickey and Rachel De Luchi appeared for the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC), in an application for judicial review of decisions taken by the QBCC in respect of claims made by homeowners under the statutory insurance scheme. Justice Jackson's reasons clarify aspects of to whom the QBCC is…
Queensland Building and Construction Commission v Crocker [2018] QCATA
7-12-18 / Rachel De Luchi — Judicial Review & Administrative
The Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) sought leave to appeal against the decision of the Tribunal to extend time to the Respondent to file an application to review a decision by the QBCC to make payments under the statutory insurance scheme in respect of work not completed under three…
