Chris Stackpoole (with Brian O’Donnell KC and Amy Low) appeared on behalf of the first defendant, instructed by Maddocks.
In summary, this case involved a procedural dispute over competing draft orders following interlocutory applications and the reasons of the Court in those applications. The Court resolved two key disagreements in favour of the plaintiff: one concerning the plaintiff’s expert evidence in reply, and the other regarding the plaintiff’s proposed ‘top-up’ evidence.
The judgment can be read by clicking here
