Whether, on the proper construction of the express terms of the cane supply agreement, the defendant was allowed to pass on certain costs. The implication of terms into the cane supply agreement which may have affected express rights to pass on the costs. Whether the defendant engaged in unconscionable conduct in passing on the costs to the plaintiffs under their agreements.
David Chesterman appeared for the defendant (led by G Gibson QC), instructed by Russells.
The judgment can be read by clicking here