Pedro-X Pty Ltd v SHRL Ventures Pty Ltd (No 2) [2025] QSC 341
12-12-25 / Chris Stackpoole — Corporations
Chris Stackpoole appeared for the defendant instructed by M Behlau & Associates. The judgment was a hearing as to final orders for a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) dispute concerning Tweed Heads Logistics Pty Ltd. The primary issue was whether an order should be made for the transfer of the plaintiff’s…
Wingstar Holdings Pty Ltd v Point Capital Group Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1553
9-12-25 / Chris Stackpoole — Corporations
Chris Stackpoole appeared for the respondents/cross-claimants, instructed by O’Loughlin Westhoff. In summary, this was an application to resist the respondents having access to subpoenaed documents, which they contended were relevant to its security for costs application. The Court largely dismissed the application, holding that most documents sought had apparent relevance…
William George Trading Pty Ltd v Enhalo En Ltd [2025] QSC 296
11-11-25 / Chris Stackpoole — Corporate Insolvency & Bankruptcy, Corporations
Chris Stackpoole appeared for the respondent, instructed by M Behlau & Associates Pty Ltd. The judgment concerned a statutory served by the respondent to the applicant claiming it was owed $6,368,054.19 AUD by the applicant. The applicant sought to have the statutory demand set aside on grounds that it is…
Brisbane Airport Corporation Pty Ltd v Airservices Australia & Anor [No 4] [2025] QSC 291
6-11-25 / Chris Stackpoole — Contract, Planning & Environment, Professional Negligence
Chris Stackpoole (with Brian O’Donnell KC and Amy Low) appeared on behalf of the first defendant, instructed by Maddocks. In summary, this case involved a procedural dispute over competing draft orders following interlocutory applications and the reasons of the Court in those applications. The Court resolved two key disagreements in…
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, in the matter of Adgemis [2025] FCA 1218
3-10-25 / Rob Anderson KC, Chris Stackpoole — Corporate Insolvency & Bankruptcy
Rob Anderson KC and Chris Stackpoole, appeared on behalf of the Inspector-General of Bankruptcy, instructed by Sparke Helmore Lawyers. In summary, this case concerned whether a sequestration order should be made against Mr Adgemis. In finding that a sequestration order should be made, the Court held that Mr Adgemis had…
