Cases - Level Twenty Seven Chambers

Top

All Cases

SHRL Ventures Pty Ltd v Pedro-X Pty Ltd [2026] QCA 119

11-5-26 / Chris Stackpoole — Appellate, Contract

Chris Stackpoole appeared on behalf of the appellant, instructed by Mia Behlau & Associates. In summary, this was an appeal against the primary judge’s findings that the appellant had breached a Joint Venture Agreement (‘JVA’), engaged in unconscionable and oppressive conduct, and had secured an agreement for the respondent to…

Pedro-X Pty Ltd v SHRL Ventures Pty Ltd (No 2) [2025] QSC 341

12-12-25 / Chris Stackpoole — Corporations

Chris Stackpoole appeared for the defendant instructed by M Behlau & Associates. The judgment was a hearing as to final orders for a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) dispute concerning Tweed Heads Logistics Pty Ltd. The primary issue was whether an order should be made for the transfer of the plaintiff’s…

Wingstar Holdings Pty Ltd v Point Capital Group Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1553

9-12-25 / Chris Stackpoole — Corporations

Chris Stackpoole appeared for the respondents/cross-claimants, instructed by O’Loughlin Westhoff. In summary, this was an application to resist the respondents having access to subpoenaed documents, which they contended were relevant to its security for costs application. The Court largely dismissed the application, holding that most documents sought had apparent relevance…

William George Trading Pty Ltd v Enhalo En Ltd [2025] QSC 296

11-11-25 / Chris Stackpoole — Corporate Insolvency & Bankruptcy, Corporations

Chris Stackpoole appeared for the respondent, instructed by M Behlau & Associates Pty Ltd. The judgment concerned a statutory served by the respondent to the applicant claiming it was owed $6,368,054.19 AUD by the applicant. The applicant sought to have the statutory demand set aside on grounds that it is…

Brisbane Airport Corporation Pty Ltd v Airservices Australia & Anor [No 4] [2025] QSC 291

6-11-25 / Chris Stackpoole — Contract, Planning & Environment, Professional Negligence

Chris Stackpoole (with Brian O’Donnell KC and Amy Low) appeared on behalf of the first defendant, instructed by Maddocks. In summary, this case involved a procedural dispute over competing draft orders following interlocutory applications and the reasons of the Court in those applications. The Court resolved two key disagreements in…

Cases — Chris Stackpoole