9-12-22 / John Ware — Planning & Environment
The applicant sought declaratory relief about a delegate's decision to give a development approval. In dispute was whether the development application approved was impact assessable rather than code assessable. The applicant, Riverside, owned Riparian Plaza which is on land adjoining the Eagle Street Pier redevelopment site in Brisbane's CBD. Riverside…
9-12-22 / John Ware — Planning & Environment
The Department of Transport and Main Roads resumed land for highway upgrades running the length of the northern boundary of land owned by Aurizon. The parties valuers disagreed as to the primary methodology for valuing the land, the applicant asserted that the hypothetical development method was the primary methodology whereas…
15-11-22 / John Ware — Planning & Environment
An application pursuant to s 32 of the Planning and Environment Court Act 2016 (Qld) sought an order permitting the applicant to extend the time to file a notice of appeal. The first and second respondents opposed the application. The first respondent issued show cause and enforcement notices to the…
14-7-22 / John Ware — Planning & Environment
The Applicant sought an order pursuant to s72(2)(b) of the Planning Act 2016 (Qld). The appellants sought to commence the development project in circumstances where the appeal would not be affected. The respondent imposed conditions with intent to use the dwelling house for a development application, resulting in substantial material…
9-6-22 / John Ware — Planning & Environment
The Applicant sought declarations and consequential orders pursuant to s 11 of the Planning and Environment Court Act 2016. The relief was sought in relation to an Action Notice issued by Council under s 3.1 of the Development Assessment Rules (the Action Notice) and a letter described as a ‘Not…
Level 27, 239 George Street, Brisbane Qld 4000