Broadbent v Medical Board of Australia [2022] QCA 46
1-4-22 / Rachel De Luchi — Judicial Review & Administrative, Professional Discipline & Regulatory
An application for leave to appeal under s 118(3) of the District Courts Act, in respect of a decision to amend a costs order of the District Court that was erroneously issued in the name of the Medical Board of Australia, when it should have been the Medical Board of…
Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 3) [2021] FCA 1254
18-8-21 / Rachel De Luchi — Judicial Review & Administrative, Professional Discipline & Regulatory
Application for costs against the Applicant following dismissal of an application for judicial review in Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 2) [2021] FCA 916. The active party Respondents sought an order for costs against the Applicant following the dismissal of the application for review. The application for costs was…
Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 2) [2021] FCA 916
6-8-21 / Rachel De Luchi — Judicial Review & Administrative, Professional Discipline & Regulatory
Led by Mr Julian Burnside QC, Rachel De Luchi appeared for the applicant in her challenges to each stage of the Professional Services Review process under the Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) (the ‘HIA’). After Dr Karmakar’s practice was reviewed, she applied to the court for declarations that decisions of…
Queensland Building & Construction Commission v Casey [2017] QCATA 100
20-9-17 / Rachel De Luchi — Appellate, Building & Construction, Professional Discipline & Regulatory
Whether the respondent, who has been an “excluded individual” for more than one event, is a permanently excluded individual. Rachel de Luchi appeared on behalf of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission, instructed by Robinson Locke Litigation Lawyers.
