Moreton Bay Regional Council v Genamson Holdings Pty Ltd [2026] QCA 23
20-2-26 / Rob Anderson KC — Land Law & Property
Rob Anderson KC (leading W D J Macintosh) represented the respondent, instructed by HWL Ebsworth Lawyers. In summary, this was an application for leave to appeal against a decision of the Land Appeal Court concerning the operation of s 16 of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 (Qld). In particular,…
Philip Usher Constructions Pty Ltd v Cross River Rail Delivery Authority & Anor (No 2) [2025] QLC 24
19-9-25 / Rob Anderson KC — Land Law & Property
Rob Anderson KC (with JS Brien) represented the first respondent, instructed by Ashurst. The matter concerned a costs application in which both parties claimed to have been substantially successful in the original proceeding regarding compensation for the compulsory acquisition of land. The applicant argued that it was simply seeking an…
Genamson Holdings Pty Ltd v Moreton Bay Regional Council (No 2) [2025] QLAC 4
18-9-25 / Rob Anderson KC — Appellate, Land Law & Property
Rob Anderson KC (with WDJ Macintosh) appeared on behalf of the appellant, instructed by HWL Ebsworth. In summary, this proceeding concerned the appellant’s entitlement to costs following a successful appeal on a preliminary issue under the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 (Qld). The Court previously found that the appellant was…
Genamson Holdings Pty Ltd v Moreton Bay Regional Council [2025] QLAC 2
19-8-25 / Rob Anderson KC — Appellate, Land Law & Property
Rob Anderson KC (leading WDJ Macintosh) appeared for the appellant, instructed by HWL Ebsworth. The primary legal issues considered were whether compensation under s 16(1A) of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 (Qld) (‘ALA’) is limited to legal valuation, or other professional costs reasonably incurred in connection with the consideration…
Philip Usher Constructions Pty Ltd v Cross River Rail Delivery Authority & Anor [2025] QLC 18
15-8-25 / Rob Anderson KC — Land Law & Property
Rob Anderson KC (with JS Brien) represented the respondent, instructed by Ashurst. The proceeding concerned a right to compensation for the resumption of land. The applicant had subsequently acquired the subject land and sought a declaration that, by operation of a Deed of Assignment, it had, or could exercise, the…
