BUMA Australia Pty Ltd v Queensland Power Company Pty Ltd [2025] QSC 338
10-12-25 / Damian Clothier KC, Matthew Doyle, Jonathan Hohl — Contract, Resources & Energy
Damian Clothier KC, Matthew Doyle and Jonathan Hohl appeared for the applicant, instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth. In summary, this case concerned disputes arising under a Contract Mining Agreement (CMA) between the respondents (who operate a power station) and the applicant (who provides mining services for the mine which powers…
Damian Clothier KC appeared for the Respondent/Cross-appellant, instructed by Allens. This case concerned a disagreement between the parties as to an appropriate cost order, following the primary decision of the Land Appeal Court. The appellants/cross-respondents sought an order that their standard costs of appearing before the Land Court and Land…
Damian Clothier KC and Jason Mitchenson appeared for the applicant, instructed by Piper Alderman. This case involved an application by the Joint Venture Testamentary Trust (JVTT) seeking directions, in the nature of judicial advice and pursuant to s 96(1) of the Trusts Act 1973 (Qld), regarding an issue as to…
Damian Clothier KC and Jonathan Hohl appeared for the respondent, instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth. The case involved a dispute over a technical services advisory agreement (TSAA), where the respondent alleged the applicant had not paid consulting service fees of $1,074,006.85 and subsequently issued a creditor’s statutory demand. The applicant…
Damian Clothier KC (with K McAuliffe-Lake) appeared for the Appellant/Cross-appellant, instructed by Allens. The central issue in this case was whether the Land Court erred in its assessment of compensation payable under s 281 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (Qld) for the grant of mining lease ML 700033, particularly…
