Andrew O’Brien appeared for the appellant on the specific error ground, instructed by Fisher Dore. The judgment concerned an appeal against conviction, regarding a previous judgment where the appellant was found guilty with three counts of rape. The grounds of appeal were whether the verdicts were unreasonable by reason of…
Andrew O’Brien appeared for the defendant (TAZ), instructed by Jones & Associates. The judgment is for a retrial ordered in a successful appeal against conviction of a joint murder charge for defendants, TAZ and SED. The primary issues considered were whether TAZ had committed murder pursuant to s 302(1)(a) of…
Andrew O’Brien appeared for the appellant (TAZ), instructed by Jones & Associates. The primary issues considered were whether to grant both applicants a no jury order pursuant to s 615 of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld), regarding a retrial ordered in a successful appeal against a joint charge of…
Andrew O’Brien (with C J Tessmann) appeared for the appellant, instructed by McGinness & Associates. The judgment concerned an appeal against conviction, regarding a previous judgment where the appellant was found to have committed murder. The grounds of appeal were whether the trial judge erred in instructing the jury that…
21-8-23 / Andrew O'Brien KC — Appellate, Succession
Andrew O’Brien KC appeared for the applicant, instructed by Rouse Lawyers. The judgment concerned an appeal concerning disputes arising out of a will or out of the administration of will trusts. The appellant filed a notice of appeal, however the Court noted that the notice was misconceived as it did…
