17-11-21 / Matthew Doyle — Contract
Proceedings addressing the respective rights of the parties to a call option deed. Namely, whether the respondents had grounds to terminate the contract on the basis that although the contract was signed the deposit was not paid in time. Bradley J declared that the applicant had exercised the call option…
29-9-21 / Matthew Doyle — Contract
Dispute regarding the terms of an oral agreement whereby the applicant allegedly agreed to assign the respondent the sole rights to the intellectual property to an invention, a proportion of shares and a proportion of profits made. The applicant sought leave for a seventh time to amend the statement of…
26-7-21 / Matthew Doyle — Corporations
This was an application where an order for asset preservation was sought by the applicant (ASIC) against the respondents in response to an ongoing investigation into potential misuse of client funds. The first respondent accepted they were a “relevant person” per the Corporations Act 2001 (“the Act”). However, the second…
31-5-21 / Matthew Doyle — Contract
Dispute regarding the terms of an oral agreement whereby the applicant allegedly agreed to assign the respondent the sole rights to the intellectual property to an invention, a proportion of shares and a proportion of profits made. In these pleadings, the applicant, by interlocutory application, sought to file and serve…
27-11-20 / Matthew Doyle, Mohammud Jaamae Hafeez-Baig — Corporate Insolvency & Bankruptcy
An appeal by a residential construction company in liquidation against a decision for the orders for the assessment of legal costs as a third-party payer. Matthew Doyle and Mohammud Jaamae Hafeez-Baig appeared for the applicant, instructed by Dowd & Co. The judgment is published here.
Level 27, 239 George Street, Brisbane Qld 4000