BUMA Australia Pty Ltd v Queensland Power Company Pty Ltd [2026] QSC 157
26-6-26 / Matthew Doyle — Contract, Resources & Energy
Matthew Doyle appeared for the applicant, instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth. The proceedings arose out of costs orders made following the substantive decision in BUMA Australia Pty Ltd v Queensland Power Company Pty Ltd [2025] QSC 338 on 28 April 2026. The respondents sought a declaration that leave to appeal…
Forsayth Resources Pty Ltd v Australia United Mining Limited [2026] QSC 99
20-5-26 / Matthew Doyle — Contract, Resources & Energy
Matthew Doyle (led by T Duggan KC) appeared for the applicant, instructed by MinterEllison. The judgment concerned whether the applicant was entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining the respondent from terminating or giving effect to the purported termination of a cooperation agreement for mining operations, pending trial. This arose after…
BUMA Australia Pty Ltd v Queensland Power Company Pty Ltd [2026] QSC 55
28-4-26 / Damian Clothier KC, Matthew Doyle, Jonathan Hohl — Resources & Energy
Damian Clothier KC, Matthew Doyle and Jonathan Hohl appeared for the applicant, instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth. This judgment concerned the issue of costs owing to the applicant, BUMA, after it was awarded a total of $32,052,279 under a Contract Mining Agreement between it and the respondent, QPC, in BUMA Australia…
BUMA Australia Pty Ltd v Queensland Power Company Pty Ltd [2025] QSC 338
10-12-25 / Damian Clothier KC, Matthew Doyle, Jonathan Hohl — Contract, Resources & Energy
Damian Clothier KC, Matthew Doyle and Jonathan Hohl appeared for the applicant, instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth. In summary, this case concerned disputes arising under a Contract Mining Agreement (CMA) between the respondents (who operate a power station) and the applicant (who provides mining services for the mine which powers…
Scott v Aulich, in the Matter of Aulich Civil law Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1329
31-10-25 / Matthew Doyle — Corporations
Matthew Doyle represented the Plaintiff, Joanna Heath Scott, instructed by Russels. The Plaintiff sought orders against two of the directors of each of the corporate defendants, Aulich Civil Law Pty Ltd, and Aulich Property Trading Pty Ltd for shareholder oppression under ss 232 and 233 of the Corporations Act 2001…
