Cases - Level Twenty Seven Chambers

Top

All Cases

MG Homes Pty Ltd v Grocorp Homes Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 1090

6-8-26 / Anthony Messina — Intellectual Property

Anthony Messina represented the first respondent/first cross claimant, instructed by Irish Bentley Lawyers. By interlocutory application, the applicants sought an interim freezing order over sale proceeds obtained by the first and second respondents from lot sales in a Pimpama development. The first respondent contended that the applicants had not established…

Wilkie v Judd & Anor [2026] QSC 54

1-5-26 / Anthony Messina — Land Law & Property

Anthony Messina appeared for the applicant, instructed by Thomson Geer. This case concerns a dispute between the owners of two adjoining residential properties, in circumstances where several structures used by the applicant encroach onto the respondents’ adjoining property. The applicant sought orders for the conveyance of the land subject to…

Elks, in the matter of Moreton Resources Limited (Receivers Appointed) [2025] FCA 1695

6-2-26 / Anthony Messina — Corporate Insolvency & Bankruptcy

Anthony Messina represented the respondent, instructed by Sasha Legal. The plaintiffs sought leave to issue a subpoena to produce documents to the proper officer of the Legal Practitioners Admissions Board. The respondent resisted the subpoena, arguing that the documents were subject to the Harman undertaking. Wheatley J was satisfied that…

Elks, in the matter of Moreton Resources Limited (Receivers Appointed) [2025] FCA 1670

22-12-25 / Anthony Messina — Corporations

Anthony Messina appeared for the Interested Person in the first, second and third interlocutory applications, instructed by Sasha Legal. In summary, the issue was whether the examination summonses issued pursuant to s 596A and s 596B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) should be set aside because of material non-disclosure,…

Hix Investment Pty Ltd v Wong [2024] FCA 1461

16-12-24 / Anthony Messina — Corporations

Anthony Messina represented the Respondents, instructed by Gilchrist Connell. This case concerns an application by the applicant seeking the grant of an interlocutory injunction to restrain the respondents from using and operating certain platforms containing plans and 3D images of portable home products that allegedly infringe the applicant’s copyright. The…

Cases — Anthony Messina