Please complete the form to watch the seminar.
15-12-20 / David Chesterman KC — Contract
The applicant submitted that he was entitled to an itemised bill since he was a “third party payer” pursuant to s 301 of the Legal Profession Act 2007 (“the Act”). The respondent argued the entitlement to request an itemised bill was dependent upon the satisfaction of the condition specified in…
15-12-20 / David Chesterman KC — Appellate, Contract
This matter concerned an appeal from the decision of the Queensland Supreme Court. Wagners Cement and Boral Resources had entered into a formal agreement concerning the purchase of cement products over a fixed term. Critically, the formal agreement contained a price adjustment provision (requiring the issuance of a pricing notice…
15-6-20 / David Chesterman KC — Judicial Review & Administrative
Proceedings where an application for declaratory relief was dismissed as the declarations sought did not comply with the principles for granting declaratory relief and lacked utility. The unsuccessful applicant sought an order that the respondent pay the applicant’s costs and submitted that the proceedings concerned the proper construction of the…
10-6-20 / David Chesterman KC — Appellate, Land Law & Property
The applicant sought an extension of time to appeal an order setting aside the renewal of his claim. The claim was for over AUD 17 million in damages. The claim had been renewed by the Registrar under rule 24 UCPR, but then set aside by a judge of the trial…
19-5-20 / David Chesterman KC — Contract
The proceeding comprised a claim and counterclaim each seeking declarations about the operation of a long term cement supply agreement. Whilst certain details are confidential, the dispute focused around the operation of a price review mechanism within the contract. The issues included the validity of certain notices served under that…
Level 27, 239 George Street, Brisbane Qld 4000