Please complete the form to watch the seminar.
23-8-16 / Roger Traves KC, Anthony Messina — Appellate, Insurance
Whether the respondent must indemnify the appellant under an insurance policy for extensive damage to a mobile crane. Roger Traves QC and Anthony Messina appeared for the successful appellant.
13-6-16 / Anthony Messina — Judicial Review & Administrative
This case was an appeal to the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Regulator to reject a claim for compensation for work-related injuries. The issue concerned whether or not work was a significant contributing factor to the injuries.
8-4-16 / Anthony Messina — Competition & Consumer
This case was an appeal to the District Court from a decision of the Magistrates Court. It concerned whether or not the respondent had contravened the Australian Consumer Law by engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct. The issue concerned the concept of ‘in trade or commerce’.
26-2-16 / Roger Traves KC, Anthony Messina — Insurance, Appellate
The case was an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court. It concerned the question of liability and quantum under the Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld). The principle issue surrounded the classification of the risk.
12-6-15 / Anthony Messina — Insurance
This case was a trial before the Supreme Court. It concerned whether or not a person breached a duty to take precautions against a risk of harm and quantum.
Level 27, 239 George Street, Brisbane Qld 4000