Cases - Level Twenty Seven Chambers

Top

All Cases

EMH IV Pty Ltd as trustee for the EMH IV Family Trust v Commissioner of Taxation [2026] FCAFC 112

28-8-26 / Mark Robertson KC, Florence Chen — Appellate, Tax

Mark Robertson KC appeared for the appellant, instructed by Small Myers Hughes Lawyers. Florence Chen (led by Ms J FitzGerald KC) represented the respondent, instructed by McInnes Wilson Lawyers. This judgement concerns an appeal from the decision in EMH IV Pty Ltd as trustee for the EMH IV Family Trust…

Laureti v Commissioner of Taxation [2026] FCA 1086

10-8-26 / Mark Robertson KC — Tax

Mark Robertson KC (leading John Fickling and Greg Antipas) appeared for the applicant, instructed by N. Panos & Associates. By way of summary, the applicant sought summary judgment against the Commissioner of Taxation in an appeal from an objection decision. The Court dismissed the application and allowed the Commissioner to…

Commissioner of Taxation v Cheung [2026] FCAFC 75

28-5-26 / Mark Robertson KC — Appellate, Tax

Mark Robertson KC (leading Mr J Byrne) represented the respondent, instructed by Macpherson Kelley Lawyers. This case concerned an appeal by the Commissioner of Taxation from a decision allowing the Respondent’s objection to amended income tax assessments. The primary judge had found that deposits exceeding $30 million received by the…

Kim Investments GC Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2) [2026] QSC 25

4-3-26 / Mark Robertson KC, Florence Chen — Tax

Mark Robertson KC with Florence Chen appeared for the appellant instructed by Small Myer Hughes Lawyers. The judgment concerned a previous judgment in which a determination was made to separate questions pursuant to r 483 of the Uniform Civil Proceedings Rules 1999 (Qld (UCPR). The appellant submitted that the outcome…

Kim Investments GC Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2026] QSC 4

23-1-26 / Mark Robertson KC, Florence Chen — Tax

Mark Robertson KC and Florence Chen appeared for the appellant, instructed by Small Myers Hughes Lawyers. In summary, this proceeding concerned a taxpayer’s appeal against the Commissioner’s objection decision. The Court was asked to determine three separate questions: (i) whether payment of the assessed amount stated in the assessment notice…

Cases — Mark Robertson KC