Cases - Level Twenty Seven Chambers

Top

All Cases

Legal Services Commissioner v Bertrand [2026] QCAT 321

28-7-26 / Rachel De Luchi — Professional Discipline & Regulatory

Rachel De Luchi appeared on behalf of the respondent, instructed by the Legal Services Commission. In summary, this was an application in a disciplinary proceeding brought against a solicitor, Mr Bertrand, where he sought to strike out the proceedings on the basis that allegations concerning a Facebook response to a…

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v D’Arro (No 2) [2026] QSC 177

22-7-26 / Rob Anderson KC — Tax

Rob Anderson KC (leading C Matthews) represented the defendant, instructed by Robinson Locke Litigation Lawyers. This judgement follows orders made on 8 June 2026 dismissing the plaintiff’s application for summary judgement and inviting further submission on the issue of costs. Each party sought their costs of the application on the…

Hodge v Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd [2026] QSC 129

18-7-26 / Jonathan Hohl — Corporations, Corporate Insolvency & Bankruptcy

Jonathan Hohl represented the first respondent, instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth. The applicant, an undischarged bankrupt, filed an originating application seeking to impugn a judgment of the Supreme Court entered against his wife and himself in 2017. The applicant later filed and served a statement of claim, which differed significantly…

Burleigh Connect One Pty Ltd v 6E1 Pty Ltd & Ors [2026] QSC 170

17-7-26 / Matthew Jones KC — Contract, Land Law & Property, Commercial Equity

Matthew Jones KC (leading J Dudley) appeared for the defendants, instructed by Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers. The proceedings arose from a dispute over the sale of development land, later developed as a Tesla dealership. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants had agreed to assume liability for significant holding costs and related…

Enyo Lawyers Pty Ltd v Island Resorts (Facilities and Equipment) Pty Ltd [2026] QCA 133

17-7-26 / Andrew O'Brien KC — Appellate, Corporations, Commercial Equity

Andrew O’Brien KC appeared on behalf of the fourth respondent, instructed by RBG Lawyers. The central focus of the appeal was whether the primary judge erred in not making an order granting priority in a receivership for payment in favour of Enyo Lawyers (the appellant), as a result of Enyo…